Virtualization at Scale: Part 2 – Architecting Scalable Virtual Infrastructure

July 2014 - Reading Time: 14 minutes

Introduction

As enterprises increasingly embrace virtualization, the architectural design of scalable virtual infrastructures becomes a critical success factor. In this post, we explore the architectural considerations, platform choices, and best practices required to build virtual environments that scale efficiently, perform reliably, and stay aligned with business goals.

Key Design Considerations for Scaling Virtualization

Scaling virtualization isn’t just about increasing host count or virtual machine density. It requires a balanced approach that considers CPU allocation, memory management, storage performance, network throughput, and failover resilience. As of 2014, most enterprise-grade designs incorporate distributed resource scheduling (DRS), high availability (HA), and load balancing.

Choosing the Right Virtualization Platform

The platform choice impacts licensing cost, hardware compatibility, features, and future scalability. VMware vSphere remains the enterprise leader in 2014, offering mature management tools and rich ecosystem integration. Microsoft Hyper-V, particularly with System Center Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM), has closed much of the feature gap. Open-source solutions like KVM and Xen continue to evolve, especially in service provider environments and Linux-centric shops.

• vSphere: Robust vCenter orchestration, storage APIs, HA/DRS, and SRM integration.
• Hyper-V: Tight Windows integration, live migration, and lower entry cost.
• KVM/Xen: Customizable, open, and commonly used by hosting providers.

Storage Architecture for Virtual Environments

Virtual workloads are heavily storage-dependent. IOPS, latency, and throughput become defining constraints in scalability. Shared storage (SAN, NAS) is a must for vMotion/live migration and high availability. As of 2014, Fibre Channel SAN remains dominant in Tier 1 deployments, while iSCSI and NFS gain traction for SMB and mid-market implementations.

Considerations include:

• Thin vs. Thick Provisioning: Balance space efficiency and performance.
• Storage Tiering: Use SSDs for performance-critical workloads, and NL-SAS for archival tiers.
• VMFS vs. NFS: Trade-offs between block-level access and flexibility.

Networking Strategies for Scalable Virtual Infrastructures

Scalable virtual networking must support isolation, performance, and automation. This includes VLAN planning, NIC teaming, and virtual switches. In larger environments, deploying a distributed virtual switch (such as VMware’s vDS) centralizes policy management. Jumbo frames, load-based teaming, and network I/O control enhance throughput and fairness.

SDN is an emerging concept in 2014 but not yet widespread. Most production environments still use traditional Layer 2/3 segmentation and ACLs.

Automation and Orchestration Tools

Manual provisioning of virtual machines and resources does not scale. Enterprises deploy tools such as VMware vRealize Automation, Microsoft System Center, and scripting with PowerShell or Python. These tools allow IT teams to define blueprints, automate VM deployment, enforce quotas, and perform configuration drift remediation.

Key practices include:

• Creating VM templates for different workload classes
• Using self-service portals for developers/testers
• Automating patching and configuration compliance checks

Monitoring and Performance Optimization

Scaling infrastructure increases complexity. Without good telemetry, performance issues go undetected. Tools like VMware vRealize Operations Manager and Microsoft SCOM help correlate metrics, baseline performance, and proactively detect anomalies. Third-party solutions like SolarWinds, Nagios, and Veeam ONE also support visibility across stacks.

Performance optimization techniques in 2014 include:

• Right-sizing VMs (avoid overallocation)
• Balancing CPU ready time and memory ballooning
• Monitoring disk queues and latency spikes

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Some common mistakes include:

• Overcommitting resources: Leads to performance degradation under load.
• Inadequate backups: Virtualization doesn’t eliminate the need for strong DR strategy.
• Ignoring network limits: Underprovisioned NICs create bottlenecks during vMotion or backup windows.
• Lack of documentation: Makes troubleshooting and scaling more complex.

Case Study: A Mid-Sized Enterprise Scaling with vSphere

In early 2014, a retail company with 1500 employees embarked on a virtualization scaling project. Their initial infrastructure supported 50 VMs across 4 ESXi hosts. By Q2, the infrastructure scaled to 120 VMs across 10 hosts with SAN-backed storage and redundant networking. Success came from strict change control, automation via vCenter Orchestrator, and proactive storage tiering.

Lessons learned included the need for storage benchmarks before rollout, early planning for IP/VLAN assignments, and implementing centralized logging from day one.

Conclusion

Architecting scalable virtualization infrastructure requires careful design across compute, storage, networking, and management layers. By leveraging proven tools, following design best practices, and staying aware of common pitfalls, enterprises can ensure their virtualization investments deliver performance, agility, and long-term scalability.

Eduardo Wnorowski is a network infrastructure consultant and virtualization strategist.
With over 19 years of experience in IT and consulting, he builds scalable architectures that empower businesses to evolve their operations securely and efficiently.
LinkedIn Profile

Monitoring Network Health with SNMP and NetFlow

July 2014 · Estimated reading time: 9 minutes

Keeping a network healthy and responsive requires visibility. In July 2014, enterprise networks continue growing in complexity, and administrators must rely on proactive monitoring tools. Two technologies dominate the field for infrastructure insight: SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) and NetFlow. While SNMP offers device and interface-level metrics, NetFlow provides rich traffic flow intelligence.

SNMP: The Backbone of Network Visibility

SNMP has been a foundational monitoring tool since the early 90s. Most network devices—routers, switches, firewalls, and even UPS units—support it out of the box. It enables centralized monitoring of hardware status, bandwidth usage, error counters, environmental sensors, and more.

Common use cases for SNMP in 2014 include:

• Monitoring interface traffic and errors
• Alerting on temperature, fan, or power supply issues
• Polling CPU and memory usage for critical appliances
• Checking BGP session status or other protocol counters

SNMPv3 adoption is still growing but remains critical due to its support for authentication and encryption. SNMPv2c remains widespread for legacy reasons, though it lacks robust security. Enterprises in 2014 are increasingly enforcing SNMPv3 for compliance and risk mitigation.

NetFlow: Seeing Beyond Polling

Where SNMP provides device-centric polling data, NetFlow delivers insight into what traffic is flowing, how much, and between which endpoints. Originally developed by Cisco, NetFlow provides per-flow data, enabling engineers to see top talkers, application breakdowns, and anomalous behavior.

Popular applications of NetFlow in 2014 include:

• Detecting unusual traffic spikes (e.g., internal hosts communicating with suspicious IPs)
• Capacity planning and trend analysis
• Attributing bandwidth usage by application or user
• Compliance reporting and auditing

NetFlow is especially useful in environments with high-bandwidth demands or multi-tenancy. Engineers gain traffic-level granularity without the overhead of full packet capture.

Best Practices for Deploying SNMP and NetFlow

While both tools are powerful on their own, using SNMP and NetFlow in tandem gives a complete picture of both health and utilization. Some best practices include:

• Segment SNMP traffic on a dedicated management VLAN
• Ensure SNMP community strings are unique and not default
• Use NetFlow version 9 or IPFIX for extensible templates
• Roll up NetFlow data at regular intervals to avoid overwhelming storage
• Deploy a centralized collector (like SolarWinds, PRTG, or nProbe)

Careful tuning of SNMP polling intervals and NetFlow export timers ensures minimal performance impact on monitored devices. Exporting from interfaces under 40% utilization is a good rule of thumb for preserving performance.

Security and Visibility

SNMP and NetFlow both raise security considerations. SNMP should always use v3 where possible, and access should be restricted by ACLs. NetFlow exporters must avoid sending data over untrusted paths. Exporting via GRE or IPSec tunnels is often used when monitoring remote offices or branches.

Conclusion

By mid-2014, it’s clear that modern networks require visibility at both device and traffic level. SNMP continues to offer indispensable device health insights, while NetFlow delivers traffic awareness that helps in planning, troubleshooting, and securing networks. Combining both provides a proactive foundation for any enterprise NOC or engineering team.

Eduardo Wnorowski is a network infrastructure consultant and technologist.
With over 19 years of experience in IT and consulting, he brings deep expertise in networking, security, infrastructure, and transformation.
Connect on Linkedin