Designing DMVPN for Multi-Branch Scalability

May 2011 | Reading time: 7 minutes

Dynamic Multipoint VPN (DMVPN) has become a cornerstone technology for scalable branch connectivity. By May 2011, network architects were increasingly looking at DMVPN to solve hub-and-spoke scaling challenges, simplify provisioning, and reduce overhead across large WAN topologies. This post dives into the design considerations, routing choices, and operational best practices for deploying DMVPN in real-world environments.

Understanding DMVPN Fundamentals

DMVPN is a Cisco technology that enables a mesh of VPN tunnels to be established dynamically between branch routers without the need for permanent static tunnels. It is based on a combination of multipoint GRE (mGRE), NHRP (Next Hop Resolution Protocol), and dynamic IPsec encryption.

mGRE allows a single GRE interface to support multiple tunnel endpoints. NHRP functions like a distributed DNS, allowing spokes to discover the real IP addresses of peers dynamically. Combined with IPsec, DMVPN ensures encrypted transport, with dynamic spoke-to-spoke tunnels formed as needed—significantly reducing latency and bandwidth bottlenecks at the hub.

Phase 1 vs Phase 2 vs Phase 3

By 2011, DMVPN was widely categorized into three phases:

• Phase 1: Classic hub-and-spoke. All traffic flows through the hub. Spoke-to-spoke traffic must hairpin at the hub.
• Phase 2: Supports spoke-to-spoke tunnels, but routing uses a flat topology. Introduces complexity with route summarization.
• Phase 3: Introduces NHRP Redirect and Shortcut messages, allowing dynamic spoke-to-spoke tunnels even with summarization at the hub.

This phase greatly improves scalability and routing convergence, making it suitable for larger environments. Phase 3 is often the recommended approach today, especially when route summarization is required at the hub for optimal scalability.

Routing Protocol Considerations

Dynamic routing protocols can be run over DMVPN tunnels, but design is critical to prevent routing loops and instability.

• EIGRP is highly compatible due to its support for split-horizon control and ease of summarization.
• OSPF requires careful area design—typically, the hub is in Area 0, and spokes are in different non-backbone areas using virtual links or redistribution.
• BGP is also viable and provides policy-based control, especially when integrating with MPLS or Internet offloading.

Split-horizon, route filtering, and summarization must be configured deliberately to prevent route flapping and blackholing.

Scalability and Design Tips

• Use Phase 3 for its summarization and redirect capabilities.
• Leverage EIGRP for simpler implementations or BGP for complex WAN integrations.
• Employ QoS on the WAN edge to prioritize NHRP, routing, and tunnel negotiation traffic.
• Carefully size the hub router. CPU and memory requirements increase with the number of spokes.
• Monitor NHRP cache sizes and tunnel memory consumption.
• Consider hierarchical DMVPN or dual-hub dual-cloud designs for large environments.

Testing in a lab environment is critical before scaling to production.

Final Thoughts

DMVPN remains a powerful tool for scalable branch networking, particularly in hybrid WAN designs that require dynamic connectivity between sites without complex provisioning. In May 2011, its maturity and the industry’s experience with various design patterns enabled reliable deployments across sectors like banking, retail, and logistics. For network engineers building distributed topologies, mastering DMVPN is an essential skill.

Eduardo Wnorowski is a network infrastructure consultant and technologist.
With over 16 years of experience in IT and consulting, he brings deep expertise in networking, security, infrastructure, and transformation.
Connect on Linkedin